About/Permissions
Jan. 11th, 2020 01:56 pmKeeper is a twelve foot merjelly from the crushing deep. Counting his longest tendrils, he's fourteen feet long. He is carnivorous and largely predatory, biologically only able to really handle live food. Though he can eat cookies, they do nothing for him nutritionally. He has bio-luminescent lights under his skin (or actually inside it) that, when stationary, appear like stars-- but can move in color shapes and patterns to either display emotion/warning signs or to hunt. He can hypnotize many creatures with these patterns but they are purely biological and not magical in nature. Your character may be completely unaffected.
All this being said, Keeper will ask to eat you. But once a 'no' is given, he won't. Even if he's grumpy about it.
Please state yes or no or pls ask first if Keeper can...
[A] Jot you
Which is to say either sting and or lightly zap. The only time he'd really do this (other than first initial tasting) is to be a brat. These jots cost no lasting damage and are akin to getting a static shock.
[B] Hypnotize you
This is just for our mutual reference really. Though of course if you feel your character can by hypnotized and you'd rather them not be, feel free to say no.
[C] Eat in front of you
Or at leas via his bell. This is more an OOC thing. It doesn't get very graphic at all but he does pull live prey in and is fairly translucent. So if it disturbs, lmk
[D] Threaten/actually try to eat you
This is for any situation wherein Keeper is effected by a curse/controlled/severely depressed about life. He won't actually eat your character, though we might have to arrange for him to be stopped. (Also your character is free to stop him themselves. Even injuring him is ok but please ask for doing anything hardcore)
[E] Actually eat you
Because you are incredibly tasty 8D
If you have other questions, feel free to ask in the appropriate thread below and I will answer. Also I am always down for backthreading. So if a situation is going to a place you're uncomfortable with, I'm down for changing what built up to it. (If otherwise we can't find an IC way to get out of it)